Re: floating point (was: Re: [Gimp-developer] R&H on Film Gimp and GIMP)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Tino Schwarze <tino.schwarze@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm just curious: What do you get by using 32-bit _float_? Why not use
> 1.31-Bit Fixed Point? It should have a higher precision than 32-bit
> float - at least, it's precision is steady.

as was mentioned already, 1.31 bit fixed point (which probably means sign
+ 31 bits mantissa) has a limited range compared to 32 bit fp.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@xxxxxxxx      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux