Claude Paroz (Freitag, 3. Juli 2009, 23:28): > > We do not use one or two po files, but a set of 40+ files in > > several directories (and probably a non-standard naming scheme) - > > is this a problem? > > Not necessarily. We already have support for multiple po files per > module, it's just that you put it to the limit :-) What's the maximal number of po files? > Paradoxically, gnome-doc-utils standard is to put a DOC_LINGUAS > variable in a Makefile.am file, to specify languages to consider > for building docs. Would it be possible for you to have such a > DOC_LINGUAS variable with the list of current languages? (no *sh > expansion please). However, this is not critical, if you don't > change anything, you'll just have to live with a warning for each > template. The build system is still "work in progress", so there is no problem adding or renaming variables (and more). Is DOC_LINGUAS = $(YET_ANOTHER_VARIABLE) ok? ("*sh expansion" = backticks or $(shell ...)?) > Is your patch to xml2po worth going upstream? If yes, did you > already report it in gnome-doc-utils bugzilla? We filed a bug report (a long time ago) and provided a patch, but didn't get any feedback. The patched version reduces the number of placeholder tags generated by the xml2po script (and thus is not backward compatible), so I don't know if the author/maintainer will like it... > The next step would be to make the images stuff work with your > particular directory setup. See for example: > http://l10n.gnome.org/module/eog/help/master/de/images/ > > I guess this would require some more ad-hoc handling on our side. We are free to change our directory structure, so just ask if there are some problems you can't solve on your side. Ulf
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs