yahvuu writes: > > uh, what, me? > > i wouldn't want to be bothered with choosing different samplers > for up/down-scaling. (I'm surprised. You are always happy with the thumbnails you get? Result after rotating an image? Maybe I'm too invested in this field to know what matters and what matters not.) Peter just gave me more ideas of how it could look in a menu: bigger (sharp) and bigger (smooth) and smaller (sharp) and smaller (smooth) The fact that bigger can be used for arbitrary warps (including downsampling) and smaller can be used for arbitrary warps (including upsampling) should not confuse anyone. (I think.) Keep the ideas coming! Nicolas Robidoux Laurentian University _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
