Suggestion implementing the s/nohalo family and the nohalobox family without an explicit, visible, parameter: Would it be possible/desirable to use the current code (which has a parameter) as some sort of template? Then, the nohalobox code would produce four independent samplers: sharperbox -> smoothing = 0 sharpbox -> smoothing = 1/3. smoothbox -> smoothing = 2/3. smootherbox -> smoothing = 1. which could be called like, say, linear. And the s/nohalo code would produce four independent samplers: sharper -> nohalo (nohalo produces the same results as snohalo with smoothing = 0, just faster) sharp -> snohalo with smoothing = 1/3. smooth -> snohalo with smoothing - 2/3. smoother -> snohalo with smoothing = 1. Nicolas Robidoux Universite Laurentienne _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer