On 12/11/2014 02:40 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/11/2014 01:19 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: >>> I could do that. You want me to update the download_prerequisites >>> file to use the later versions of gmp and mpfr after you've updated >>> the tarballs at the infrastructure location? >>> >>> You should know, however, that for whatever reason the build only ran >>> through the original error once. I encountered a different error >>> further along in the build, and when I ran "make clean && make >>> MAKEINFO=true" to pick up some changes I'd made in gcc/configure, the >>> build failed in the same place, with the same errors. >>> >>> Apparently I have to run make && make check in the gmp6 build >>> directory in order for the top-level build to run successfully. >> >> It looks like this will be something of an iterative process. As an >> experiment, we could try a patched version of download_prerequisites >> which points to the URLs that you used. If you can send that, we >> could begin the experiment. We must do that before updating the >> tarballs at the infrastructure location. > > I'll do this as soon as I have time, which may not be until this or > next weekend. > > Are you sure you want to move forward with updating...given the > unusual behavior of the in-tree build i'm experiencing? Yes, because I'd like to try it on a non-Android system. One other possibility is to find a more recent version of gmp that everyone can agree on, then patch that version of gmp to work on android, then tell the gmp people what they need to do. We need to update the default versions of gmp anyway. Andrew.
