On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/12/14 00:08, Cyd Haselton wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 12/04/2014 09:00 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: >>>> Why is make complaining about those functions when they aren't being >>>> referenced? Are the functions supposed to be transformed in some way? >>> >>> The names are being munged, like this: >>> >>> #ifndef __MPN >>> #if __GMP_HAVE_TOKEN_PASTE >>> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_##x >>> #else >>> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_/**/x >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> >>> #define mpn_tdiv_qr __MPN(tdiv_qr) >>> >>> I have no idea why. But it might have some relevance for your problem. >> >> Any chance this started in GCC 4.9.x? If not, it's back to the code-parsing... > > I don't know. Hint: compile with -save-temps. Look at the preprocessed > source. > > Andrew. > > So, after grepping through a lot of intermediate files, I can safely say that if there should be files containing rules for munging the various mpn_ functions, they do not exist or are missing. There are defines for various mpn_ functions, mostly in gmp.h, but nothing for munging them. Is this something to report to mpfr or gmp maintainers or here?
