On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/04/2014 09:00 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: >> Why is make complaining about those functions when they aren't being >> referenced? Are the functions supposed to be transformed in some way? > > The names are being munged, like this: > > #ifndef __MPN > #if __GMP_HAVE_TOKEN_PASTE > #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_##x > #else > #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_/**/x > #endif > #endif > > #define mpn_tdiv_qr __MPN(tdiv_qr) > > I have no idea why. But it might have some relevance for your problem. > > Andrew. > Any chance this started in GCC 4.9.x? If not, it's back to the code-parsing...
