On 05/12/14 00:08, Cyd Haselton wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/04/2014 09:00 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: >>> Why is make complaining about those functions when they aren't being >>> referenced? Are the functions supposed to be transformed in some way? >> >> The names are being munged, like this: >> >> #ifndef __MPN >> #if __GMP_HAVE_TOKEN_PASTE >> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_##x >> #else >> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_/**/x >> #endif >> #endif >> >> #define mpn_tdiv_qr __MPN(tdiv_qr) >> >> I have no idea why. But it might have some relevance for your problem. > > Any chance this started in GCC 4.9.x? If not, it's back to the code-parsing... I don't know. Hint: compile with -save-temps. Look at the preprocessed source. Andrew.
