On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/12/14 00:08, Cyd Haselton wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 12/04/2014 09:00 PM, Cyd Haselton wrote: >>>> Why is make complaining about those functions when they aren't being >>>> referenced? Are the functions supposed to be transformed in some way? >>> >>> The names are being munged, like this: >>> >>> #ifndef __MPN >>> #if __GMP_HAVE_TOKEN_PASTE >>> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_##x >>> #else >>> #define __MPN(x) __gmpn_/**/x >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> >>> #define mpn_tdiv_qr __MPN(tdiv_qr) >>> >>> I have no idea why. But it might have some relevance for your problem. >> >> Any chance this started in GCC 4.9.x? If not, it's back to the code-parsing... > > I don't know. Hint: compile with -save-temps. Look at the preprocessed > source. > > Andrew. > > I'm still trying to find which Makefile to add -save-temps to in order to output the intermediate files (gmp/Makefile, mpfr/Makefile and gcc/Makefile yield nothing). However, while waiting for another run of make to fail, I did an ls -alt in the build directory and, according to the timestamps, it appears as though mpfr is being configured and built before gmp. Shouldn't this be the other way around, and could this possibly cause the errors I'm seeing?
