Re: GCC 4.9.2 Build Fails at cc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Cyd Haselton <chaselton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/14 18:25, Marc Glisse wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 6 Dec 2014, Cyd Haselton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this something to report to mpfr or gmp maintainers or here?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You should first try a recent version of GMP. The one from
>>>>> download_prerequisites is older than Android...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If we need to update download_prerequisites we can easily do that.
>>>>
>>>> Andrew.
>>>>
>>> See my most recent question about current version and stability.
>>> Also, version 5.0.0 did not resolve the issue.
>>
>>
>> 5.0.0 is not that recent either...
>> (why anyone would first try version x.y.0 when many x.y.z are available is
>> beyond me)
>>
>
> Because there's a balance between later stable version and later
> version that works with an in-tree build of GCC/MPFR/MPC.
> My reasoning was that 5.0.0 is the next version up from 4.3.2...which
> is the version specified in download_prerequisites...but that was
> before finding out that version 5.0.0 introduced a bunch of new code.
> 6.0.0 is the most stable version, but

Additionally see this link
https://gmplib.org/list-archives/gmp-devel/2014-April/003778.html
which is one of the many results of Googling "latest stable gmp that
works with mpfr, mpc."  Finding the correct information about which
versions work with others is a game of sifting through lots of
mis-info....i'm lucky that the link hsppens to mention version 3.1.0
of mpfr is needed to work with gmp 6, but what about mpc? I could just
wing i...download mpfr 3.1.0 and gmp 6 and cross my fingers...but, if
it doesn[t work, downloading multiple versions of *any* source to
re-do in-tree builds is kind of a pain on an Android device...

>>> Additionally, while I can configure gmp on Android, I cannot build it
>>> as some of the dependencies...specifically mpn...require M4 and
>>> setting M4=m4-not-needed does not work for them.
>>
>>
>> Passing --disable-assembly to configure might make m4 optional (in gmp-6).
>>
>
> Thanks...I will try that.
>
>>> While I'm working on
>>> porting a lot of standard linux utilities to Android, I'm limited to
>>> those that require a minimum of reconfiguration and/or ones that I'm
>>> somewhat familiar with.  M4 is outside of both of those requirements.
>>
>>
>> I don't think m4 should be hard to port (but I have no experience with
>> android).
>
> Is the build complexity similar to, say, curl?
>
>>
>> --
>> Marc Glisse




[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux