"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | | > If you believe you have a solution that actually works, then you have | > the choice between: | > (1) writing a formal proposal and contact the ISO C commitee; | > (2) writing a formal proposal and convince the GNU C maintainers | > that your proposal worths adding to GNU C, and work out the | > details with them. | | I don't think is a big enough issue for me to warrant that much effort | :-) Certainly there is a lot of function pointer usage in many | applications, and I think it would be beneficial to be able to define | both the pointers and the functions themselves using the same typedef, | but I don't think it's worth introducing potential code parsing | problems. I'm glad we share similary conclusions: # yes. And I did not find it terribly annoying, compared to what I # would have to come up with. ;-) -- Gaby
