Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If you believe you have a solution that actually works, then you have the choice between:
(1) writing a formal proposal and contact the ISO C commitee; (2) writing a formal proposal and convince the GNU C maintainers that your proposal worths adding to GNU C, and work out the details with them.
I don't think is a big enough issue for me to warrant that much effort :-) Certainly there is a lot of function pointer usage in many applications, and I think it would be beneficial to be able to define both the pointers and the functions themselves using the same typedef, but I don't think it's worth introducing potential code parsing problems.
