"Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
| Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:
|
| > But the syntax of C doesn't have the language construct of "here's a
| > label (identifier), here's the type of that label, and here's it's
| > body".
|
| Yeah, that's what I figured.
|
| > So, no, you'll have to do it "the hard way".
|
| Agreed. Seems like a rather illogical oversight to be able to able to
| define a "type" for a function but not actually be able to declare
| functions of that "type" (except as pointers to them), but that's
| we've got.
You mean like this:
typedef int F(int);
F f; /* function "f" taking an int and returning an int. */
?
-- Gaby
