On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 9:02 PM Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Do we need to process the 'salt' elements and 'remap-dir' elements in > order and remap old salt elements as remap-dir elements get loaded? That > also seems fragile to me. > > Perhaps some command that the flatpak could run to generate host salt > values so that it could remap them into new salt elements using the > mapped paths? > > Alternatively, we could just assume that only flatpak will use the salt > mechanism and leave this for a future enhancement? I think in practice salt on the host-side of something like this will only be there if we're using multiple levels of containers, which all pass down the outermost fonts. I don't think this is going to be very common at all, so maybe just ignoring it for now is fine? _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
