Alexander Larsson <alexander.larsson@xxxxxxxxx> writes: $ cat /run/host/font-dirs.xml > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd"> > <fontconfig> > <remap-dir real-path="/usr/share/fonts">/run/host/fonts</remap-dir> > <remap-dir real-path="/home/alex/.fonts">/run/host/user-fonts</remap-dir> > </fontconfig> > > Is this format acceptable? Its mostly about naming the nodes and the > attributes, so its basically trivial. If you want i can rename things > or change orders, but I'd really just like an Ack on something. Format looks OK. I think we might bike-shed on the names here a bit -- 'real-path' is pretty ambiguous as both paths are 'real', one is just the file system path and the other is the cache path. I like using the file system path as the contents of the element and the cache path as the property, but perhaps the property name could be 'cache-path' instead? -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
