On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:20 PM Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:54 PM Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think we might bike-shed on the names here a bit -- 'real-path' is > > pretty ambiguous as both paths are 'real', one is just the file system > > path and the other is the cache path. I like using the file system path > > as the contents of the element and the cache path as the property, but > > perhaps the property name could be 'cache-path' instead? > > Hmm, that looks not intuitive to me. in fact both are also a font > path. "cache path" are the sort of /var/cache/fontconfig or so. how > about "host-path"? although one can see it is remapping a path to > somewhere but still missing how this actually works in fontconfig. > i.e. to determine a cache filename to read. I agree that cache path is wrong as we have something else by that name. host-path kinda hardcodes the sandbox case for rewriting though. Maybe "remapped-path"? _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
