2010/9/15 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>: > On 09/15/2010 02:26 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Hypothetical example: >> >> - F-14 has systemd-10 in the repo >> - there's some bug in an included systemd service file in an app that >> needs fixed. >> - oops, to do that right requires an updated systemd package, say, version 12 >> - the version of that in rawhide include updated units that override >> parts of the initscripts startup, halt, and other services >> - you then backport... what, exactly? And how much effort is it worth >> to work on fixing this, rather than fixing F-15? > > How are you going to deal with the same hypothetical example in F15? > > If we assume that FESCO shows superb level of competence in the F15 > cycle and bases its decisions on facts not assumptions and fears and > hypothetical examples that might cause us to loose all our users since > we would be shipping systemd without the six month experience on the > field and gnome-shell <insert third ingredient of feature in the mixed > that might bring doom to us all ) at the same time and accepts systemd > as a feature. it is called risk management. -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
