2010/9/15 Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Micha� Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) said: >> >, in particular since >> > the thing that was perceived as lacking was mostly system integration. >> >> ??? >> >> I do not understand this argument. Upstart is still lacking of system >> integration. All scripts are sysvinit style, so it's not integrated. >> So what's the point in upstart buzz? Equally, it could be to return to >> sysvinit - because it's more stable, more documented and better >> integrated than upstart :) > > Hypothetical example: > > - F-14 has systemd-10 in the repo > - there's some bug in an included systemd service file in an app that > needs fixed. > - oops, to do that right requires an updated systemd package, say, version 12 > - the version of that in rawhide include updated units that override > parts of the initscripts startup, halt, and other services > - you then backport... what, exactly? a fix for service file > And how much effort is it worth to work on fixing this I guess that is that this is the work of package maintainer. >, rather than fixing F-15? Ok, so the same argument can be used before F15 Beta. Systemd is not ready, because it may require fixing in stable (it's a common knowledge, that Fedora packages must meets the same criteria as RHEL packages in terms of stability - only fixes for critical bugs), so let's revert to Upstart again - Systemd will be a great feature for Fedora 16 :) > > Bill Regards, Michal -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
