Micha� Piotrowski (mkkp4x4@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >, in particular since > > the thing that was perceived as lacking was mostly system integration. > > ??? > > I do not understand this argument. Upstart is still lacking of system > integration. All scripts are sysvinit style, so it's not integrated. > So what's the point in upstart buzz? Equally, it could be to return to > sysvinit - because it's more stable, more documented and better > integrated than upstart :) Hypothetical example: - F-14 has systemd-10 in the repo - there's some bug in an included systemd service file in an app that needs fixed. - oops, to do that right requires an updated systemd package, say, version 12 - the version of that in rawhide include updated units that override parts of the initscripts startup, halt, and other services - you then backport... what, exactly? And how much effort is it worth to work on fixing this, rather than fixing F-15? Bill -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
