On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:37 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:24:47PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > ...or, since the current justification for having stable releases at all > > is 'to handle upgrade cases we can't handle with yum', have a new stable > > release only when we hit such a case (and try to hit as few such cases > > as possible)... > > I think going through a process of stabilization and making releases is a > good development practice. I think having a repository which is required to always be of a 'releasable' quality would be a *better* one :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
