On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 13:01 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:50:14 -0400 > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > I do too. I suspect for situations like this we at a minimum need to > > adopt a more formal process for pulling feedback/votes/whatever outside > > of the meeting timeframe, whether it's calling a special session, enforcing > > a 'you must vote in the ticket by this timeframe or your vote is counted > > as <foo>', or something else. > > You left out removing the fanatical devotion to releasing every six months :-). > I've really never understood that one. Why is virtually everything subordinate > to getting a release out at an artificial deadline? Why not just release when > there appears to be enough things working to justify a new release? ...or, since the current justification for having stable releases at all is 'to handle upgrade cases we can't handle with yum', have a new stable release only when we hit such a case (and try to hit as few such cases as possible)... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
