Re: Introducing Steam + video game testing criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 12:18 PM Adam Williamson
<adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a
> > > blocker then?
> > >
> >
> > For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite
> > naturally - people just use it. E.g. Steam, Chrome, VSCode, etc. I've been
> > running Steam on F38 since Beta (and it helped me to discover an issue in
> > mutter, which was later accepted as a blocker - but not because of Steam,
> > but because of general issues). But if you want to have an explicit test
> > case, Adam described how to do it. We could also have a test day for
> > popular third-party software, if it makes sense.
> To be fair, we did miss
> (I missed it
> because I run Steam via Flatpak, not RPM). So we do have scope to
> improve there. I do think testing commonly used third-party stuff is a
> good idea, to be clear, and I'm all in favor of adding optional test
> cases for it.

And I'm fine with us adding some optional test cases for this. Would
running a test day each cycle also be possible?

真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam, report it:

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux