On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 13:49 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:39 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is there a way we can add regular testing for it without making it a > > blocker then? > > > > For popular third-party software, I think this testing occurs quite > naturally - people just use it. E.g. Steam, Chrome, VSCode, etc. I've been > running Steam on F38 since Beta (and it helped me to discover an issue in > mutter, which was later accepted as a blocker - but not because of Steam, > but because of general issues). But if you want to have an explicit test > case, Adam described how to do it. We could also have a test day for > popular third-party software, if it makes sense. To be fair, we did miss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2177287 (I missed it because I run Steam via Flatpak, not RPM). So we do have scope to improve there. I do think testing commonly used third-party stuff is a good idea, to be clear, and I'm all in favor of adding optional test cases for it. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
