On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 14:23 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 02:12:16PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > Oh, sorry -- I read too quickly and I'm doing too many things at once. > > > I'd like to consider dropping packaged release notes entirely -- but if > > > we have them, the should be the right version. > > > > So: > > > > "If branded or generic release notes exist in the release repository, > > they must up-to-date for the current version. If they are shipped on > > media, they must match." > > > > Or something like that. Or we could just take the decision to drop > > packaging them entirely and not bother to mention it. > > > > It's not my place to decide whether we want to ship packaged release notes > or not. But I think the world has changed and almost no one now cares about > packaged release notes. The internet is today in your pocket and the notes > are likely to be outdated the day we release them. So if I were to decide > this, I'd be inclined to remove this criterion completely. > > Of course, Adam's or Matthew's proposal does no harm, so +1 to any of > those, if you want to go forward with it. I think a slightly tweaked version of Matt's text is good, as it doesn't require that we have release notes at all, only that if we *do* have them anywhere, they not be outdated. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
