On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:49:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > +1. Release notes outside of the artifact (like, online) are more > > helpful anyway because they can be updated with late-breaking concerns. > > I'd be surprised if people even think to look at local release notes. > Well, the modification I just applied already removes the requirement > for the notes to be on the media. The change I'm proposing now is > effectively to add "...but if there ARE release notes on the media, > they must be the correct ones", as that's kind of left out at present. Oh, sorry -- I read too quickly and I'm doing too many things at once. I'd like to consider dropping packaged release notes entirely -- but if we have them, the should be the right version. I think we should _have_ release notes and that be an overall blocker at the Go/No-Go meeting and tracked by the FPgM, but I don't see much value in having them in the repository. Possibly the existing notes package could be replaced by a simple document pointing to the docs site. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
