On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 05:17 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Per https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/471 and > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221920 , it seems we no > > longer want to require release notes to be present on all media. For > > simplicity's sake, I suggest we simply remove the media section of the > > criterion entirely. > > > > We could I suppose require that media include some kind of pointer to > > the release notes, but this seems difficult in the case of e.g. cloud > > images. > > > > Anyone have comments, alternative proposals? Thanks! > > > > For the record, the criterion is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_ > > 23_Final_Release_Criteria#Release_notes : > > > > "The final branded release notes must be present on release-blocking > > images and the appropriately versioned generic release notes must be > > available in the release repository." > > > > I propose amending it to: > > > > "The final branded and generic release notes must be present in the > > release repository." > > Sounds good. A mere couple of years late, I have now implemented this change. :) I wonder, though, if on second thought we shouldn't have simplified it so much - perhaps it should be: "The final branded and generic release notes must be present in the release repository. Release-blocking images must ''either'' not include release notes at all, ''or'' include the final branded release notes." Thoughts? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
