Re: What does one do about a package maintainer with an attitude problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 03:21 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Here it's mandatory to examine how long has been waited between posting
the steps and deciding that the ticket won't be reopened.
The maintainer in question has been active on bugzilla (as noted previously, he closed two other bugs of mine with INSUFFICIENT_DATA) after I posted the reproduction steps, so it seems clear that were he planning on reopening the ABRT ticket based on my additional posted information, he would have already done so.
Further, the
reporter can reopen tickets, too. So, why has the ticket not been
reopened by the reporter?
In the past, I have been yelled at rather aggressively by some package maintainers for reopening tickets which I felt were closed inappropriately.

Certainly not all package maintainers act that way, but some do, and my recent experience with this particular package maintainers suggests that getting into an CLOSE / OPEN / CLOSE ... back-and-forth with him would not be a wise strategy.

  jik
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux