Re: What does one do about a package maintainer with an attitude problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:08:06 -0400, Fernando Cassia wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > I have little interest in wasting my time engaging in pointless "mediation"
> > that is just going to boil down to he-said, she-said,
> 
> If mediation is not something you're interested in, because your time
> is too valuable (but apparently, the module owner time's is not, as
> you feel free to waste HIS time with a bug report that lacks the steps
> to reproduce), 

??? Jonathan pointed out that he had added reproduction steps to the
tickets. That's why we need to discuss details -> specific tickets.
For example:

> > I posted my own reproduction steps in the bug and he didn't reopen it.

Here it's mandatory to examine how long has been waited between posting
the steps and deciding that the ticket won't be reopened. Further, the
reporter can reopen tickets, too. So, why has the ticket not been
reopened by the reporter? *Then* it would get more interesting, if none
of the assignee/watchbugzilla packagers would respond anymore at all.
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux