Re: What does one do about a package maintainer with an attitude problem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2013 12:44 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
I'd suggest either the person's sponsor or https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Community_working_group
How does one find out someone's sponsor?

I looked at the Wiki page for the CWG, and it doesn't have any enforcement powers. "Specific anti-duties of the CWG: playing the role of arbitrator... in a dispute; making judgments in a dispute." Frankly, I do not think this is a communication issue; I think the only way this is going to change is if somebody with the authority to do so tells this individual that the way he's maintaining his packages isn't OK and compels him to do things differently or find another way to spend his time.

I have little interest in wasting my time engaging in pointless "mediation" that is just going to boil down to he-said, she-said, i.e., me saying, "This is not how things are supposed to be done. Doing things this way is damaging to the community and to the Fedora project," and him responding, "Yes, it is. No, it isn't." I've been involved with the FOSS community for long enough to know how such conversations turn out when there is no one in a position of authority to make and enforce judgments.

  jik

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux