Re: why not a partition assignment mode? (Re: community etiquette (Re: Rename anaconda to cryptoconda?))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 22:00 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> 
> > 
> > I don't know why you'd expect a 'partition assignment only' mode to
> > exist, given that there wasn't one in F17 and there was no indication of
> > one in any of the design documents for newui.
> 
> Maybe it's expected because 95% of the world's desktop/server OS's
> have this option. 

Erm. Really? Are you sure we're not talking at cross-purposes here? I'm
not sure I recall seeing any installer other than Mandriva's which
offers a special version of its partitioning interface where you cannot
create or remove partitions, only select mount points for existing
partitions. That is what the OP is describing.

> And maybe it's expected because it actually works with a very simple
> and discoverable UI for both basic and advanced user needs.
> 
> Let's rephrase the question, open to the whole list: why is a point
> and shoot install to a volume (or partition) such a bad idea that it
> isn't even an option in anaconda?

I'm not sure that question makes any sense in context.

> Why is the first thing we do choosing a device, rather than a
> partition or a volume?

Because people find it very valuable to be able to leave certain disks
out of the installation and be entirely sure they will not be touched by
the install process...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux