On 11/06/2012 09:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 20:34 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>On 11/06/2012 08:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >Fact is, a_lot_ of people still dual boot with Windows, because they're
> >not sure they want to switch 100% to Linux, or they still need to run
> >some apps on Windows, or they want to play games, or whatever. Is anyone
> >seriously doubting it's a common and important use case?
>
>Arent users on OS-X and Apple hw doing the exact same thing?
Sure, but there are far fewer OS X users than Windows users. It's just a
numbers game.
There is another factor at play there, though, to be fair. When we wrote
the criterion, our support for Intel Macs was still pretty much
non-existent. That was the time when we explicitly wrote into the
criteria that we didn't support Intel Macs. So obviously we weren't
going to block on OS X dual boot. That consideration probably doesn't
apply any more, though the numbers game still does.
--
Well the fundamental question to ask ourselves is if windows or os-x do
honor other operating system installed then we should if not we should
not regardless of any numbers game you like to play trying to justify
this criteria...
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
