On 09/11/2012 04:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2012-09-11 5:52, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Maybe we should say:
> 'The installer must be able to (successfully) install *all
> release-blocking desktops* for each supported installation method
> (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
I think that's better, if we assume the new behaviour in anaconda is
actually intended.
There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug). User
has to choose something, so we can use the Kamil's version. It seems to
me reasonable to require installation of release blocking desktops in
Alpha phase.
I agree. We should also consider whether we want tighter criteria for
Beta and Final. At some point we should certainly require a minimal
install to work - I'd say each of the 'desktop' sets, plus the
'minimal' option, are the most common use cases, probably.
It goes without saying we should start with testing minimal up to the
point it works then whatever is added on top on that hence minimal
should be an alpha criteria and more or less our first priority...
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
