On 2012-09-11 5:52, Petr Schindler wrote:
> Maybe we should say:
> 'The installer must be able to (successfully) install *all
> release-blocking desktops* for each supported installation method
> (DVD, live, netinst, PXE, ...)'
I think that's better, if we assume the new behaviour in anaconda is
actually intended.
There is no default 'package set' now (by design, it's not a bug).
User
has to choose something, so we can use the Kamil's version. It seems
to
me reasonable to require installation of release blocking desktops in
Alpha phase.
I agree. We should also consider whether we want tighter criteria for
Beta and Final. At some point we should certainly require a minimal
install to work - I'd say each of the 'desktop' sets, plus the 'minimal'
option, are the most common use cases, probably.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
