Re: Request for feedback: %pycached macro for %files section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:18 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 1:00 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 16. 12. 19 16:56, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > For what it's worth. I think %pycached is a nice improvement. I'm not
> > > sure if I like the name of it specifically, but the behavior is quite
> > > desirable.
> >
> > Naming things ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
> >
> > I was thinking:
> >
> >   %with_pycache - collides with bconds
> >   %include_pycache - quite long
> >   %pyc - quite indecipherable
> >   %pycache - might be mistaken to only include the pyc files
> >
> > %pycached doesn't sound that bad to me - include that file, but also its cached
> > Python bytecode. However I am not a native speaker and I realize I often
> > desecrate the English language. Got any better suggestions?
> >
>
> %pyfile is probably quite enough for that. It looks and feels like a
> marker instead of something strange, and the underlying behavior is
> somewhat immaterial.
>

I support this incremental improvement.

I agree with Neal here. %pyfile is probably the best/simplest option.
It will read best too, as it basically says "Deploy the functionality
of this python file in the appropriate manner". The implementation can
then be adjusted as needed.
_______________________________________________
packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux