Re: Confused by non-numeric version in release guideline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:59:52AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
In my personal descending order of preference I would do one of these:
Version: 0
Release: 1.rNNN
Thanks ..

For the moment I've used:

  Version: 0.1
  Release: 0.1.r11
What issue are you trying to solve by this choice?

You are not solving anything.

I don't understand what you mean.

Let me turn my question around: Why can't you directly use the upstream version?

Ralf


--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux