This package just numbers their tarballs using the subversion release number. For example, 'r8' and 'r11': http://code.google.com/p/dlfcn-win32/downloads/list As far as I'm aware they are not planning on using "real" version numbers at any time in the future, nor have they used real version numbers in the past. I don't understand which if any of these guidelines apply to this case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease In particular, what should the Version be? (And while we're at it, what should the Release be?) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
