On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > In my personal descending order of preference I would do one of these: > Version: 0 > Release: 1.rNNN Thanks .. For the moment I've used: Version: 0.1 Release: 0.1.r11 Ignore the Version number for now - I can change that to just be '0' later if necessary. How about the Release number: Isn't it more correct to use 0.<n>.r<mm> instead of <n>.r<mm>? (I mean, in case upstream decides to use 0 or 0.1 as a real version number later on?) This is the package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
