Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 17:24 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:12:55PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Replace one can not with it's too much hassle to and you'll see where I > > was going. Reduce the hassle factor doing things right and suddenly > > static libs will get less attractive. > > Ok. What will be replacing them? Help create properly autotooled rpm transparently for people that don't care about infrastructure stuff. You already have cluster managers that use rpm as a payload. That takes care of the deployment, of the interfering stuff in /usr/local, etc > In any case I doubt it may be as simple as what we have with static > libs, with statically linked executables created by adding -static to > the link command line... You focus too much on the current technical solution and not enough on user needs. The problem is not to replicate the same old & broken solution ad vitam eternam but to make the correct technical solution attractive enough for users to switch. I won't share nuggets of ass-backwards common wisdom here, that would strike to close to my employer systems, but sometimes you need to re-asses why a particular solution was chosen at a time and if you can not achieve the original goals better now with stuff that was not available a decade ago. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
