Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 13:16 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:00:42PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > Which sort-of hints shipping static libs is a short-term workaround and > > energy would be better spend making tools like eclipse integrate our > > best-of-breed infrastructure (autoconf, rpm, yum, mock whatever) > > transparently so these people don't have to spend time on plumbing to > > produce modern sofwtare. > > I can't see the connection between eclipse and the issues at stake > here... Shipping static libs is not necessarily a short term workaround, > dynamic libs keep changing ABI and one cannot necesarily install > everytime the libs on all the computers he may want to run a program. > How is it related with eclipse??? Replace one can not with it's too much hassle to and you'll see where I was going. Reduce the hassle factor doing things right and suddenly static libs will get less attractive. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
