Re: Re: paragraph on shipping static numerical libs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > The right fix here is to educate scientific programmers as to why
> > statically linking in libraries doesn't actually get them what they
> > want, and that it is broken.
> 
> Actually the situation in scientific camps is not that easy. There are
> tons of situations where having a statically linked binary saves the
> day. You typically have a complete mix of very heterogeneous Linux
> distributions and releases thereof with semi-bogus libs under
> /usr/local as a bonus. At least that's what larger phys/chem
> institutions and educational facilities look like in
> de/uk/fr/ru.

So, my reading of this is 'larger phys/chem institutions are
crazy and don't understand sane systems management'. Am I reading
this wrong?

If you want consistent results, run a consistent platform.

Bill

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux