Re: Re: libtool(.la) archive policy proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:29 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:20:19PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> > ...and in many cases, end up unnecessarily bloating linkage of
> > binaries/libs in main packages too, making things like soname changes
> > even more painful than they already are...
> 
> I think the thread made clear that this is not the case.

If it did, I missed it.  Got any pointers to posts that support the
above conclusion to share?



--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux