On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 02:20:19PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:05 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) writes: > > > > > The outcome for me is that the "drawback" of keeping *.la files > > > unconditionally is that some *.devel files get a couple too many > > > BRs, > > -devel packages get bloated Requires, not BuildRequires. Yes, thanks, that's correct and what I meant. > ...and in many cases, end up unnecessarily bloating linkage of > binaries/libs in main packages too, making things like soname changes > even more painful than they already are... I think the thread made clear that this is not the case. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpaxF3KLnA0U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
