On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:05 +0200, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) writes: > > > The outcome for me is that the "drawback" of keeping *.la files > > unconditionally is that some *.devel files get a couple too many > > BRs, -devel packages get bloated Requires, not BuildRequires. Or if they're not there, other packages in a lot of cases need bloated BuildRequires in order to only accomplish also unnecessarily bloating the resulting binaries/libs, see below. > > and a very few (like kdelibs) get a dozen too many. > > ... and that you have to put .la files into main packages (which is > adding untracked dependencies) and you slow down module loading... ...and in many cases, end up unnecessarily bloating linkage of binaries/libs in main packages too, making things like soname changes even more painful than they already are... -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
