Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) writes: >> ... and that you have to put .la files into main packages (which is >> adding untracked dependencies) and you slow down module loading... > > o Can you show a list of bugs related to main packages missing *.la > files to compare the pains? And doesn't this contradict your > statement "*.la files are unneccessary"? AGAIN (and citing [1]): Sentence was written under the assumption that all .la files will be shipped. When .la will not be shipped they do not need to be in main packages (nor in -devel ones) because they are not shipped. > o How many milliseconds are we losing for module loading through *.la > files? How much faster in percentage do the modules load w/o *.la > files? Dunno. But we can save these few milliseconds without any costs by removing the .la files. Enrico Footnotes: [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-October/msg00062.html
Attachment:
pgpt6aX2cVKjP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
