https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108905 Bug ID: 2108905 Summary: Review Request: webkitgtk - <short summary here> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://catanzaro.fedorapeople.org/webkitgtk-review/webkitgtk.spec SRPM URL: https://catanzaro.fedorapeople.org/webkitgtk-review/webkitgtk-2.37.1-1.fc37.src.rpm Description: WebKitGTK is the port of the WebKit web rendering engine to the GTK platform. Fedora Account System Username: catanzaro The point of this new source package is to build WebKitGTK multiple times with different build options: webkit2gtk5.0: GTK 4 webkit2gtk4.1: GTK 3, libsoup 3 webkit2gtk4.0: GTK 3, libsoup 2 This does not yet include webkit2gtk5.0 because it's not stable yet. (E.g. we might remove the '2' from the API version, which would affect the package naming.) So for now it just includes webkit2gtk4.1 and webkit2gtk4.0. We added webkitgtk4.1 to the existing webkit2gtk3 package today as a temporary emergency measure to try to get GNOME packages into good shape before the mass rebuild. webkit2gtk3 will be retired once this new source package is approved. The webkit2gtk4.0 packages are identical to and obsolete the existing webkit2gtk3 package, as well as the older webkitgtk4 package before that. Different names, same thing. I plan to remove these subpackages next year. Because it takes a very long time to build this package, I went ahead and ran fedora-review myself and uploaded the content raw and unedited as a starting point: https://catanzaro.fedorapeople.org/webkitgtk-review/review.txt. Of course some of the complaints there are silly, e.g. it doesn't know about rpm-autospec. I notice an error already, it provides libwebkit2gtkinjectedbundle.so()(64bit), but this is private and should have been filtered out. Will investigate that. Lastly, I'm a bit confused why there is a webkitgtk-debuginfo package even though there is no webkitgtk binary package. But it's small and seems harmless. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108905 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
