[Bug 2108905] Review Request: webkitgtk - GTK web content engine library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108905



--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #4)
> (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #1)
> > Another thing I noticed is that various 4.0 packages seem to be missing
> > license files. Can you make sure they match with what's shipped in the 4.1
> > packages?
> > 
> > e.g.
> > %files -n webkit2gtk4.1-jsc
> > %license _license_files/*JavaScriptCore*
> > %{_libdir}/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.1.so.0*
> > %dir %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0
> > %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/JavaScriptCore-4.1.typelib
> > 
> > %files -n webkit2gtk4.0-jsc
> > %{_libdir}/libjavascriptcoregtk-4.0.so.18*
> > %dir %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0
> > %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0/JavaScriptCore-4.0.typelib
> > 
> > ... where the 4.0 version is missing %license.
> 
> Ah, I guess it's possible for the same file to go into multiple subpackages,
> as long as it's identical? OK then.

Yes, it's possible to share identical files between subpackages, but that's not
what's happening here. The %license macro (when called on a file in the source
tree) copies the file to /usr/share/licenses/<binary_package_name>/

So if you have:

%files -n webkit2gtk4.0-jsc
%license _license_files/*JavaScriptCore*

%files -n webkit2gtk4.1-jsc
%license _license_files/*JavaScriptCore*

it copies _license_files/*JavaScriptCore* to both
/usr/share/licenses/webkit2gtk4.0-jsc/ and
/usr/share/licenses/webkit2gtk4.1-jsc/ which are different paths.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108905
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux