https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717652 Bug ID: 1717652 Summary: Review Request: prusa-slicer - G-code generator for 3D printers (RepRap, Makerbot, Ultimaker etc.) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reporter: tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/prusa-slicer/prusa-slicer.spec SRPM URL: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/prusa-slicer/prusa-slicer-2.0.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: PrusaSlicer takes 3D models (STL, OBJ, AMF) and converts them into G-code instructions for FFF printers or PNG layers for mSLA 3D printers. It's compatible with any modern printer based on the RepRap toolchain, including all those based on the Marlin, Prusa, Sprinter and Repetier firmware. It also works with Mach3, LinuxCNC and Machinekit controllers. PrusaSlicer is based on Slic3r by Alessandro Ranelucci and the RepRap community. Fedora Account System Username: tibbs Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35318604 Please note that this is essentially a rename of the existing slic3r-prusa3d package, on top of which I have done extensive packaging work to re-enable the test suite and untangle the status of many bundled libraries. Upstream has decided to rename its fork as part of the release of a significant new version. Because the new program uses a different configuration file location (~/.PrusaSlicer instead of ~/.Slic3rPE or .Slic3rPE-beta), this new version is not quite suitable as an update for F29 or F30. rpmlint says: prusa-slicer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mSLA -> ms La, slam, ms-la prusa-slicer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolchain -> tool chain, tool-chain, Chaitin prusa-slicer.src:135: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(boost-nowide) prusa-slicer.src:139: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(igl) prusa-slicer.src:150: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(mesa-libGLU) prusa-slicer.src:172: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(nanosvg) prusa-slicer.src:186: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(polypartition) prusa-slicer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US mSLA -> ms La, slam, ms-la prusa-slicer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolchain -> tool chain, tool-chain, Chaitin prusa-slicer.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/prusa-slicer/COPYING-avrdude prusa-slicer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary prusa-slicer I would provide versions for those bundled libraries but in those cases I haven't been able to determine which version to use (or upstream just doesn't use versions). And while it would be nice to have a manual page for prusa-slicer and I indeed might write one at some point, that wouldn't generally be a review blocker. If you see strange-permission warnings on the srpm, that's due to my umask (0770) and won't appear with packages generated by the Fedora buildsys. Finally, as this package is an evolution of an existing package, I have kept the old changelog entries. I realized I should delete entries between this package and the last released package, but if approved I'll do that before importing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
