[Bug 1717652] Review Request: prusa-slicer - G-code generator for 3D printers (RepRap, Makerbot, Ultimaker etc.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717652



--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #5)
> Thanks.  Some responses:
> 
> I can't imagine that 4.5MB of data in /usr/share/PrusaSlicer is considered
> large, given what I see in my /usr/share currently.  It's about 2MB icons
> (about 40% of which is images of the prusa printers) and 2MB translations. 
> Doesn't seem really worth it to try and split it out when it wouldn't save
> anything for any spin or end user system, but if more translations pile in
> then it might be worth it.

Ack.

> I mentioned in the initial message that you may see the strange-permissions
> thing if running rpmlint directly on the srpm I provided.  My umask is 0770
> (because we use the posix ACL schema here where every user has their own
> group) and "fedpkg srpm" creates the source package using the on-disk
> permissions, which is arguably a bug but not one that matters except that
> rpmlint complains for whatever reason.  The packages generated from the
> buildsystem won't have that issue.

I've missed that in the original message. Ack.

> And yes, the summary is exactly what upstream is currently using, both on
> their github repo and in the Debian packaging metadata they maintain (hidden
> in the "debian" branch).  I'm not sure what text would be better, though
> it's pretty hilarious that it doesn't explicitly mention Prusa.  Just saying
> "G-code generator optimized for Prusa printers" would work, I guess, but
> still assumes you know what G-code means.  Maybe copying the cura package
> and using "3D printer control software optimized for Prusa printers" would
> be OK.  I think I'll go with that.

Does it control the printer already?

If not, what about:

3D printing slicer optimized for Prusa printers

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux