https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1717652 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- > This comment can go away now I suppose. You're right, fixed. > Who owns %_datadir/PrusaSlicer ? Indeed, %dir added there. I'd forgotten it when setting up the %lang tagging. > Why si this commented out? The tests started to work again? The upstream bug was fixed and I cherry picked the patch. Forgot to remove that bit after verifying that the patch worked. The bug I filed generated some interesting discussion as it found a real bug but they claim that we shouldn't be turning on the compiler flag that found the bug because it's a performance loss. It's a Fedora-default flag, not something specifically done in this package. I've updated the package to release 2: Spec: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/prusa-slicer/prusa-slicer.spec SRPM: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/prusa-slicer/prusa-slicer-2.0.0-2.fc31.src.rpm Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35320754 (will take some time to finish) I still need to cherry pick a few patches to fix some minor interface bugs, but that will be a work in progress thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
