On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 13:48 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Well since I seem to be talking to the right person now, I know you hate this > > question, but ... how strongly would you object to having an rt kernel > > variant within Fedora? > > LOL. I asked this question two years ago. I doubt the answer has > changed. :) But the situation HAS changed. A LOT. There is now (or is going to be) a realtime kernel in _RedHat Enterprise_ of all places. If it is good and stable for RHEL why wouldn't it be good for Fedora? (but I miss the answer you got a while back which could have been completely different). In the latest spins of my rt kernel I have actually used the patch set of the RHEL beta realtime kernel _and_ the patch set of the latest Fedora kernels [NOT fun to integrate!], with very good results, in fact much better than the stock Ingo patches - don't know exactly why - and the first decent 2.6.24.x realtime kernels I've tested. So there you are. The answer should be different, right? :-P -- Fernando [wow, this list got very lively in a second...] _______________________________________________ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
